Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 135/2022

Case between Asarithody Amina vs Shahul Hameed regarding balance court fee rejection

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Anjali.P, Additional Munsiff-II
Order Date
2025-09-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Asarithody Amina filed a suit against Shahul Hameed. The case was about the balance court fee which was not paid.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was not represented, and since no balance court fee was paid, the plaint was rejected.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was not represented, and since no balance court fee was paid, the plaint was rejected.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected under order 7 Rule 11(c) CPC due to non-payment of balance court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected under order 7 Rule 11(c) CPC due to non-payment of balance court fee.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint was rejected under order 7 Rule 11(c) CPC due to non-payment of balance court fee.

Judgment Evidence:

The case was posted for Balance court fee on 18.08.2025, 08.09.2025. No balance court fee paid. Plaint rejected under order 7 Rule 11(c) CPC.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Asarithody Amina
Party Age
51
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shahul Hameed
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Beeran Koya. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Thrivikraman Namboothiri
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff's case was rejected due to non-payment of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Plaint rejected under order 7 Rule 11(c) CPC.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Asarithody Amina vs Shahul Hameed regarding balance court fee rejection
Case Code Year
Case between Asarithody Amina vs Shahul Hameed regarding balance court fee rejection

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/S.UCO Bank vs Mrs.Surya Bindu.U.C et al regarding loan recovery.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rajesh vs Shahida.T.K regarding realisation of amount.
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Classic Pipes Syndicate vs Mr.Thurasserikandi Meethal Ajeesh regarding realization of money
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.P.Vasudevan vs Areekkal Sunil Kumar et al regarding realisation of advance money
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs BABEESH.K et al regarding realisation of amount.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won