Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 151/2025

Case between Arun Mohan vs Rinimol K.R regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-08-07
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Arun Mohan filed a suit against Rinimol K.R for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case involves issues of property possession and allegations against Rinimol related to personal conduct and property vacating.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendant must vacate the property within one month and imposed a permanent prohibitory injunction against trespassing.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to vacate the plaint schedule building within 1 month failing which the plaintiff will be entitled to execute the same through the process of this court. Permanent prohibitory injunction granted.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved his legal possession over the property and the necessity for the injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. 1. Defendant is directed to vacate the plaint schedule building within 1 month failing which the plaintiff will be entitled to execute the same through the process of this court. 2. Defendant, her men and agents are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule building.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Arun Mohan (41 years years) Thaikkoottathil house, Chottanikkara P.O, Eruveli Desom, Kanayannur village, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 312

Defendants

Rinimol K.R (40 years years) Dwaraka, Thalakkod P.O, Mulamthuruthy Desom, Kanayannur village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 314

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is directed to vacate the plaint schedule building within 1 month.
Evidence:
Defendant is directed to vacate the plaint schedule building within 1 month failing which the plaintiff will be entitled to execute the same through the process of this court.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant and her agents are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule building.
Evidence:
Defendant, her men and agents are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule building.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document proves the plaintiff's ownership of the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the plaintiff's case regarding the threats received from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the plaintiff's legal possession over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document further validates the plaintiff's ownership and responsibility for the property.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases