Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 151/2025

Case between Arun Mohan vs Rinimol K.R regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-08-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Arun Mohan filed a suit against Rinimol K.R for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case involves issues of property possession and allegations against Rinimol related to personal conduct and property vacating.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendant must vacate the property within one month and imposed a permanent prohibitory injunction against trespassing.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to vacate the plaint schedule building within 1 month failing which the plaintiff will be entitled to execute the same through the process of this court. Permanent prohibitory injunction granted.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the defendant must vacate the property within one month and imposed a permanent prohibitory injunction against trespassing.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved his legal possession over the property and the necessity for the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved his legal possession over the property and the necessity for the injunction.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has shown his legal possession over the property through Ext A3. Hence, it can be safely concluded that the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as sought for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. 1. Defendant is directed to vacate the plaint schedule building within 1 month failing which the plaintiff will be entitled to execute the same through the process of this court. 2. Defendant, her men and agents are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule building.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Arun Mohan
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rinimol K.R
Party Age
40
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy sale deed no. 687/24 of SRO Mulanthuruthy, True copy of the complaint filed by the plaintiff before the SHO, Chottanikara Police Station, Land tax receipt bearing Tandepper no. 13349 issued by Kanayannur village office, Building tax receipt bearing no. R G070903-25002914 issued by Chottanikkara Grama Panchayath
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R.Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jomon P Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sibi Karun
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Sunny Manacherry
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is directed to vacate the plaint schedule building within 1 month.
Evidence:
Defendant is directed to vacate the plaint schedule building within 1 month failing which the plaintiff will be entitled to execute the same through the process of this court.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant and her agents are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule building.
Evidence:
Defendant, her men and agents are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule building.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document proves the plaintiff's ownership of the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the plaintiff's case regarding the threats received from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the plaintiff's legal possession over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document further validates the plaintiff's ownership and responsibility for the property.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Arun Mohan vs Rinimol K.R regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Arun Mohan vs Rinimol K.R regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won