Case Summary
The plaintiff is seeking a declaration that there was no contract or transactions between him and the defendant. The defendant had lodged a false complaint against the plaintiff regarding an employment visa.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was not entitled to the declaration and injunction he sought.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
PW1 is not entitled to get declaration and injunction as prayed for, and the suit is dismissed.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, suit is dismissed. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Arun Kumar A.H
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mithun Gopi.A
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Complaint along with the reply issued by the Public information officer and Inspector, SHO Ernakulam Town South Police Station
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.S Manu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Dilu Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.A Anupaman
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.Y Vijaykumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Manju E.R
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anandhu Satheesh
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Alint Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought a declaration that there was no contract or transaction between him and the defendant.
Evidence:
Hence PW1 is not entitled to get declaration and injunction as prayed for and the suit is dismissed.
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The plaintiff also sought a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from raising any claim against him.
Evidence:
Hence PW1 is not entitled to get declaration and injunction as prayed for and the suit is dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Complaint under Right to Information Act
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the copy of the complaint obtained by the plaintiff to support his claims.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Arun Kumar A.H vs Mithun Gopi.A regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Arun Kumar A.H vs Mithun Gopi.A regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction