Case Summary
The plaintiff, Arun Kumar A.H., is seeking a declaration that no contractual relationship exists between him and the defendant, Deekshit Dinesh, regarding an employment visa. The defendant accused the plaintiff and a deceased individual of cheating after a payment was made for a visa that was not arranged.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Declaration of no valid contract and permanent prohibitory injunction against raising claims.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved that he had no contractual dealings with the defendant or the deceased regarding the visa.
The plaintiff successfully proved that he had no contractual dealings with the defendant or the deceased regarding the visa.
Judgment Evidence:
A decree is passed declaring that there was no valid contract or transactions in existence between the plaintiff and the defendant regarding arrangement of any employment visa for employment in Canada for any purpose whatsoever, of the defendant.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Arun Kumar A.H. (49 years)
Santhi Nivas, Chullickal, Thopumpady P.O., Kochi-682 005
Defendants
Deekshit Dinesh (Age not specified years)
House No.4/1181, Goshree Street, North Cherlai, Mattaanchery P.O., Kochi-682 002
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
A decree is passed declaring that there was no valid contract or transactions in existence between the plaintiff and the defendant regarding arrangement of any employment visa for employment in Canada.
Evidence:
A decree is passed declaring that there was no valid contract or transactions in existence between the plaintiff and the defendant regarding arrangement of any employment visa for employment in Canada for any purpose whatsoever, of the defendant.
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed restraining the defendant from raising any claim against the plaintiff for payment of any amount.
Evidence:
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed restraining the defendant from raising any claim against the plaintiff for payment of any amount, in the absence of any valid contract or transaction between the plaintiff and the defendant before any forum or authorities.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendant and from his assets.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Certified copy of complaint
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted by the defendant before the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Kochi, and was marked in evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Certified copy of complaint
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted by the defendant to the Station House Officer, Ernakulam Town South Police Station against the plaintiff and was marked in evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Oral Evidence
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
The unrebutted oral testimony of the plaintiff established his case.
Reference: