Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 654/2022

Case between Arun Ashok Iyyani et al vs Anitha Anuj regarding mediation settlement

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Arun Ashok Iyyani and Neena James are the plaintiffs in this case against Anitha Anuj, which involves a dispute settled through mediation. The court found the terms of the mediation agreement to be lawful and decreed the suit accordingly.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the mediation report and found the terms of the mediation agreement lawful. The suit was decreed based on these terms.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of mediation agreement were found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Arun Ashok Iyyani (33 years) Iyyani House, Annamanada P O, Chalakudy Taluk, Thrissur District, Pin 680741 Neena James (33 years) ‘Aardra’, Near Asram H S S, A-M Road, Perumbavoor, Ernakulam District, Pin 683542

Defendants

Anitha Anuj (42 years) Thyparambil House, Jawahar Nagar, 92, Kadavanthara, Ernakulam, Now residing at Plot A3, Kent Hyde Park, Nadama Village, Thripunithura, Ernakulam, Pin- 682301

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Hence suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement. Mediation shall form part of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases