Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 654/2022

Case between Arun Ashok Iyyani et al vs Anitha Anuj regarding mediation settlement

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Arun Ashok Iyyani and Neena James are the plaintiffs in this case against Anitha Anuj, which involves a dispute settled through mediation. The court found the terms of the mediation agreement to be lawful and decreed the suit accordingly.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the mediation report and found the terms of the mediation agreement lawful. The suit was decreed based on these terms.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the mediation report and found the terms of the mediation agreement lawful. The suit was decreed based on these terms.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Terms of mediation agreement is found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Arun Ashok Iyyani
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Neena James
Party Age
33
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anitha Anuj
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sibi Karun
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aneez Fahid K A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Hence suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement. Mediation shall form part of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Arun Ashok Iyyani et al vs Anitha Anuj regarding mediation settlement
Case Code Year
Case between Arun Ashok Iyyani et al vs Anitha Anuj regarding mediation settlement

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won