Case Summary
Petitioner Ariamanichola Iyyachkutty filed a petition to allow an application, which was contested by respondent Ayanikkal Ibrahim resulting in an order allowing the petition on payment of costs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allowance of application on payment of costs
Case Type
Civil Application
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition on payment of costs of Rs.3500.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The counsel for the respondent submitted that the application can be allowed on terms. I am inclined to allow this petition on payment of costs of Rs.3500/-
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ariamanichola Iyyachkutty
- Party Age
- 62
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ayanikkal Ibrahim
- Party Age
- 37
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- K. Vipin
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Respondent
- Advocate Name
- Advocate for Ayanikkal Ibrahim
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Allowance of application
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petition to allow an application
Evidence:
The application is filed second time. I am inclined to allow this petition on payment of costs of Rs.3500/-.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ariamanichola Iyyachkutty vs Ayanikkal Ibrahim regarding application allowance
Case Code Year
Case between Ariamanichola Iyyachkutty vs Ayanikkal Ibrahim regarding application allowance