Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1478/2025

Case between Archana.S.S. vs South Indian Bank Ltd. regarding gold loan and housing loan disputes.

Court
Additional Munsiff-III
Judge
Smt. Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-11-26
Duration
approximately-5 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Archana.S.S. and her husband Manoj.M.G, are seeking a temporary injunction against the South Indian Bank Ltd. regarding the auction of gold ornaments due to defaults in loan payments. The defendants argue that the loans have been correctly classified as non-performing assets as per RBI guidelines.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the plaintiffs' application for a temporary injunction, ruling that they failed to establish a prima facie case. The balance of convenience was found to favor the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the plaintiffs' application for a temporary injunction, ruling that they failed to establish a prima facie case. The balance of convenience was found to favor the defendants.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to prove a prima facie case for granting an injunction.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner has miserably failed to establish a prima facie case in her favour. The respondents have the right to exercise general lien over the securities of petitioner as per Section 171 of Contract Act.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, this application stands dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Archana.S.S.
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Manoj.M.G
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
South Indian Bank Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Area General Manager, South Indian Bank Ltd
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Notice dated 07/08/2025, Notice dated 11/08/2025, Original Deposits/Pay-in-Slip dated 18/08/2025, Original Letter dated 20/08/2025, Written Letter dated 25/08/2025, Gold auction Notice dated 25/08/2025, Copy of Order in WPC 40707/2025 dated 03/11/2025.
Defendants Documents
Copy of Gold Loan Pledged form dated 10/07/2023, Copy of agreement for staff Housing Loan dated 17/08/2019, Notice under order 39 R1 of CPC and Copy of Plaint and petition.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. D.Arun
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Sandhya.L.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Abhijith.D
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Anil Kumar.A.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petitioner sought an order of injunction restraining the defendants from auctioning the gold ornaments.
Evidence:
Thus there is no prima facie case in favour of petitioner for grant of an order of injunction.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice dated 07/08/2025 informs the total amount payable to the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice dated 11/08/2025 issued under section 13(2) of SARFAESI Act.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Deposits/Pay-in-Slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original of deposits/pay-in-slip dated 18/08/2025 for the payment of Rs.1,04,500.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original of letter dated 20/08/2025 directing the petitioners to pay the market value of the gold pledged.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Written Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The petitioner's written request dated 25/08/2025 to close the gold loan account.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Gold auction Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The gold auction notice dated 25/08/2025 informing the petitioners of the auction.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Copy of Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The copy of order in WPC.40707/2025 dated 03/11/2025.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Gold Loan Pledged Form
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The copy of the gold loan pledged form.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Agreement for Staff Housing Loan
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The copy of the loan agreement dated 17/08/2019.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Notice under order 39 Rule 1 of CPC received by the respondents.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Copy of Plaint and petition
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The copy of the plaint and petition received by the respondents.
Reference:
Ext.B4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Archana.S.S. vs South Indian Bank Ltd. regarding gold loan and housing loan disputes.
Case Code Year
Case between Archana.S.S. vs South Indian Bank Ltd. regarding gold loan and housing loan disputes.

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Aradhi Restaurant regarding rejection of plaint
Court of Principal Munsiff
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won