OS. No. 406/2018

Case between Aravindakshan Pillai vs Tomy Joseph regarding Realization of Money

Court

THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM

Judge

Smt. Ragi.S.

Order Date

2025-08-19

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a suit filed by the plaintiff for the realization of money. The plaintiff has failed to remit the balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The plaint was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the balance court fee.

Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected as the plaintiff failed to comply with court fee requirements.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected as the plaintiff failed to comply with court fee requirements.

Supporting Evidence

The plaint was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the balance court fee.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code. Pronounced by me in open court on this the 19th day of August, 2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Aravindakshan Pillai
Party Age: 58
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Tomy Joseph
Party Age: 51
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. G.Gopakumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Parvathy S.Pillai
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Smt.T.R. Rajalekshmi
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Plaintiff's plaint rejected due to non-remittance of balance court fee.

Evidence:

Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification