Case Summary
Anupama Ghildyal filed a suit against Kiran Somnath for the dissolution of their partnership firm 'HUB & BYTES'. The case revolves around allegations of misconduct and negligence by the defendant in managing the partnership.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The partnership firm is dissolved and the defendant is directed to settle the accounts.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the dissolution of the partnership firm and directed the defendant to settle the accounts.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established her case warranting the grant of relief sought for based on the uncontroverted testimony and evidence.
The plaintiff established her case warranting the grant of relief sought for based on the uncontroverted testimony and evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established her case warranting the grant of relief sought for based on the uncontroverted testimony and evidence.
The plaintiff established her case warranting the grant of relief sought for based on the uncontroverted testimony and evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff had established his case warranting the grant of relief sought for.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit decreed with costs as follows: The partnership firm is dissolved. The defendant is directed to settle the accounts.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anupama Ghildyal
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kiran Somnath
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
A124.04.2013 Partnership Deed, A211.05.2015 Copy of Email, A320.02.2016 Lawyers Notice, A422.02.2016 Acknowledgment Card
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K. Satheesh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Dissolution
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The partnership firm is dissolved.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit decreed with costs as follows: 1.The partnership firm is dissolved.
Relief Type:
Settlement of Accounts
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to settle the accounts.
Evidence:
2.The defendant is directed to settle the accounts.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Partnership Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The partnership deed outlines the terms of the partnership and establishes grounds for dissolution.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Copy of Email
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The email serves as evidence concerning the operations of the partnership.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Lawyers notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice indicates legal communication related to the partnership issues.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Acknowledgment card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The acknowledgment card is relevant to confirming receipt of communication regarding partnership matters.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2021