Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Anu Subash and others, failed to appear for the hearing, while some defendants were represented by counsel. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their counsel's relinquishment of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiffs' absence and a lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs did not appear for the hearing, and their counsel relinquished vakalath.
The plaintiffs did not appear for the hearing, and their counsel relinquished vakalath.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs did not appear for the hearing, and their counsel relinquished vakalath.
Judgment Evidence:
This suit have been came up before me for hearing on 17.07.2024 and the court on the same day delivered the following: JUDGMENT Plaintiff absent. No representation D2 to D4 represented. No representation for plaintiff. There was specific direction for Plaintiff to appear. Plaintiff counsel had relinquished vakalath. Dismissed. All pending I.A’s stands closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anu Subash
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Subash
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Avandika Subash
- Party Age
- 11
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sacred Heart Church
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Victoria
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dixon
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Denny
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Denish
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.S Bharathan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Alphin Antony
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Aadithyan S Mannali
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Visakh Antony
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Abel Antony
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Christine Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rance R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- L. Aloysius Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.C Charles
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Vimal K Charles
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Renju A.T
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit has been dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs and relinquishment of vakalath by their counsel.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. No representation D2 to D4 represented. No representation for plaintiff. There was specific direction for Plaintiff to appear. Plaintiff counsel had relinquished vakalath. Dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Anu Subash et al vs Sacred Heart Church et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Anu Subash et al vs Sacred Heart Church et al regarding dismissal of suit