Case Summary
Anu John is the petitioner seeking restoration. Radhakrishnan Nair and Geetha Krishnan are the respondents who represent no objection to the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition for restoration is allowed as the respondents have no objection.
Why Plaintiff Won:
No objection from the respondents led to the favorable decision for the petitioner.
No objection from the respondents led to the favorable decision for the petitioner.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
R1 and 2 have no objection.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition is allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anu John
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Radhakrishnan Nair
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Geetha Krishnan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anu John
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2023