Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 30/2025

Case between Antony vs Murukavasan regarding recovery of money

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-10-31
Duration
approximately-3 years 5 months
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Antony, is seeking recovery of an amount borrowed by the defendant, Murukavasan, under a promissory note. The defendant failed to repay the borrowed amount despite multiple demands.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed, and the plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount claimed along with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.2,64,000/- together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed, and the plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount claimed along with interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff succeeded in proving his case through the evidence and documents presented.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff succeeded in proving his case through the evidence and documents presented.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has succeeded in proving his case. Moreover, there is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, this suit is decreed as follows: (I) The suit is decreed and the plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.2,64,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Sixty Four Thousand Only) together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till the realization from the defendant and his assets, with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Antony
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Murukavasan
Party Age
55
Relation
null
Plaintiffs Documents
Promissory note, Office copy of lawyer’s notice, Postal receipt, Acknowledgment card
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mathew Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nil
Appearance Type
Case between Antony vs Murukavasan regarding recovery of money > Case advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.2,64,000/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
the suit is decreed and the plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.2,64,000/- together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till the realization from the defendant and his assets, with costs.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant shall pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Defendant shall pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document evidences the loan granted by the plaintiff to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Office copy of Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice demanded repayment of the borrowed amount from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It shows the evidence of sending the lawyer's notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It confirms the receipt of the lawyer's notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Antony vs Murukavasan regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Antony vs Murukavasan regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Tue, 05/03/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Bijil Sukumaran vs Syam Kumar regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Jayakumar vs Sunitha Kumari regarding recovery of arrears of rent
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sreedharan Nair.V vs Basheer regarding Realisation of Money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s.Canara Bank vs M/s.Achu Chand FAB & Fancy Collection et al regarding realisation of money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Binu Dev vs Ramanan regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won