Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 445/2022

Case between Antony Varghese vs Jaisoorya G.S et al regarding a civil suit

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-07-17
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Antony Varghese is the plaintiff represented by his Power of Attorney Holder Thomas Kurian. The case involves a civil suit, but the plaintiff was absent and the suit was dismissed against one defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiff was absent and had not paid the balance court fee, leading to the rejection of the plaint.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff absent. No representation. Suit already dismissed against D2. D1 is Exparte. Balance Court Fee not paid. Plaint rejected.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Antony Varghese (56 years years) Changadakkiriyil House, 13 A, Heera Waters, 28, Kadavanthara, Chilavannor, Kochi – 682020 Thomas Kurian (59 years years) Chackalackal, Athirampuzha P.O, Kottayam, Pin – 686 560

Defendants

Jaisoorya G.S (44 years years) Valliath House, V.P. III/156, Anayadi P.O, Sooranad, Pallickal, Kollam, Pin- 690 561 Bank of Baroda (Age not specified years) Aluva Branch, Mukkath Plaza, Bye-pass Junction, Periyar Nagar, Aluva, Enakulam District- 683101

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit against the second defendant was dismissed.
Evidence:
Suit already dismissed against D2.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff's case has been rejected due to lack of representation and unpaid court fees.
Evidence:
Plaint rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases