Case Summary
Antony Varghese is the plaintiff represented by his Power of Attorney Holder Thomas Kurian. The case involves a civil suit, but the plaintiff was absent and the suit was dismissed against one defendant.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff was absent and had not paid the balance court fee, leading to the rejection of the plaint.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Suit already dismissed against D2. D1 is Exparte. Balance Court Fee not paid. Plaint rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Antony Varghese
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thomas Kurian
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- Power of Attorney Holder
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jaisoorya G.S
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bank of Baroda
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.I Abraham
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Aswathy Roy
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Roy George
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit against the second defendant was dismissed.
Evidence:
Suit already dismissed against D2.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff's case has been rejected due to lack of representation and unpaid court fees.
Evidence:
Plaint rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Antony Varghese vs Jaisoorya G.S et al regarding a civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between Antony Varghese vs Jaisoorya G.S et al regarding a civil suit