Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1136/2025

Case between Anto Augustine et al vs Google LLC et al regarding service of summons.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2026-01-14
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Anto Augustine and others, are seeking to serve summons via email to the defendants, which include multinational companies. The court found that there is no provision for such service by email as the official addresses are known.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition to serve summons via email and directed the petitioner to proceed under the appropriate rules for service.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition to serve summons via email and directed the petitioner to proceed under the appropriate rules for service.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that there is no provision for serving summons by email when the official address is known.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that there is no provision for serving summons by email when the official address is known.
Supporting Evidence
The address of Defendant 1 is known to the petitioner... there is no provision in Code of Civil Procedure or Rules of Practice for service of summons to defendant by email.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition is dismissed. Petitioner is directed to take steps for service of summons under Order V Rule 25 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anto Augustine
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Roji Augustine
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Josekutty Augustine
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Google LLC
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Tiding Digital Publications Pvt. Ltd.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shajan Skariah
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Muhammed Firdouz A V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petition for taking steps through email.
Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Anto Augustine et al vs Google LLC et al regarding service of summons.
Case Code Year
Case between Anto Augustine et al vs Google LLC et al regarding service of summons.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 01/01/2026 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/21/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Multinational Company

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won