Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
E.P No. 333/2024

Case between Anthiyalunkal Deepa Mathai vs Sarath Prakash regarding execution proceedings.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-12-10
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Anthiyalunkal Deepa Mathai is the decree holder and Sarath Prakash is the judgment debtor in this execution petition. The court ordered that nothing remains to be satisfied in the execution petition and it was closed.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that all aspects of the execution petition were satisfied and ordered its closure. The decree holder was instructed to take steps regarding the property mentioned in the inventory list.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court found that all aspects of the execution petition were satisfied and ordered its closure. The decree holder was instructed to take steps regarding the property mentioned in the inventory list.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court concluded that all terms of the execution petition had been fulfilled, thus closing the petition.

Judgment Evidence:

Decree Holder represented. Delivery effected. Nothing remain to be satisfied in the E.P. E.P closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anthiyalunkal Deepa Mathai
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sarath Prakash
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C. R Vinod Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vinuchand Sajo
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anil Kumar C. R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Silpa Gopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renjith Rajan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
E.P closed with no further satisfaction required.
Evidence:
Nothing remain to be satisfied in the E.P. E.P closed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Anthiyalunkal Deepa Mathai vs Sarath Prakash regarding execution proceedings.
Case Code Year
Case between Anthiyalunkal Deepa Mathai vs Sarath Prakash regarding execution proceedings.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Mahendra Kumar. C vs Suresh. V. Varghese regarding E.P No. 199/2023
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Cornation Curries Private Limited vs Happy Varghese et al regarding E.P No. 31/2020
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Shamughapuram Co-operative Bank Limited vs Sumathy Vijayan regarding execution petition
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Manager, DTDC Express Limited et al regarding decree satisfaction
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won