Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Original Suit No. 198 OF 2018

Case between Anoop.P. vs Mukesh.P. regarding partition

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-08-31
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Anoop.P. filed a suit for partition against Mukesh.P. regarding property that belonged to their deceased mother and father. The court found that they are entitled to equal shares of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, granting a preliminary decree for partition of the properties as claimed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A preliminary decree for partition is passed.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed and a preliminary decree for partition is passed as follows: The plaint B and C schedule properties shall be divided into 2 equal shares, by metes and bounds.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Anoop.P. (50 years years) Keraladheeswarapuram amsom desom, Tirur Taluk. Sindhu.P. (45 years years) Puthan Chirayil House, Keraladheeswarapuram amsom desom, Tirur Taluk.

Defendants

Mukesh.P. (52 years years) 'Surabi', Keraladheeswarapuram amsom desom, Santhi Nagar, Tirur Taluk. PIN – 676 307.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
A preliminary decree for partition was granted to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed for.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit allows for the division of the B and C schedule properties into equal shares.
Evidence:
The plaint B and C schedule properties shall be divided into 2 equal shares, by metes and bounds.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to prove the ownership and entitlement of the plaintiff to a share in the B schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish the relationship of the property in question to the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supported the evidence regarding the inheritance of the property by the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was presented as evidence of the historical ownership of property relevant to partition.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document contributed to establishing the plaintiff's claim regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the evidence presented but its specific relevance was not detailed.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases