Case Summary
Anoop.B filed a suit against Sainudeen. On 19.02.2025, the plaintiff chose not to press the suit, leading to its dismissal.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff did not press their claims.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff chose not to pursue the suit, resulting in its dismissal.
The plaintiff chose not to pursue the suit, resulting in its dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The learned counsel for the plaintiff submitted that the suit is not pressed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anoop.B
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sainudeen
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S. Vikraman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Dinesh
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Rahul K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
The learned counsel for the plaintiff submitted that the suit is not pressed. Endorsement also made to that aspect. Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2018