Case Summary
Anoop is the plaintiff and Divya.A.U along with various managers of banks are the defendants. The case was finally heard, and it was settled through mediation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in terms of the mediation agreement, which shall form part of the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case was settled through mediation.
The case was settled through mediation.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The case was settled through mediation.
The case was settled through mediation.
Supporting Evidence
The suit was decreed in terms of the mediation agreement.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit decreed in terms of mediation agreement. The mediation agreement shall form part of the decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anoop
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Divya.A.U
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manager, State Bank of India, Thirumala Branch
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manager, Ananthapuram Co-operative Society, Thirumala
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manager, State Bank of India, Cotton Hill Branch
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S. Suresh Babu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Praveen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The suit decreed in terms of mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Suit decreed in terms of mediation agreement.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement