Case Summary
Anoop R is suing Jeomon P.K for an unpaid amount related to a program his daughter participated in. The plaintiff claims that the defendant owes him Rs. 12,000 for the services of his daughter as a child artist.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff failed to array his minor daughter as a party to the suit, and did not prove entitlement to claim the amount.
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff failed to array his minor daughter as a party to the suit, and did not prove entitlement to claim the amount.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Anoop R (41 years years)
Vattamparambil House, Paduva P.O, Akalakunnam Village, Kottayam District, Pin – 686 564.
Defendants
Jeomon P.K (32 years years)
Puthussery House, Njarakkal P.O, Njarackal Village, Ernakulam District.
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff sought recovery of Rs. 12,000/- for services rendered by his minor daughter.
Evidence:
Hence, I am of the opinion that the suit cannot be positively entertained and that it is liable to be dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Whatsapp Conversations
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court utilized these conversations to understand the context and agreement between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1 series
Document Type:
Legal Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court acknowledged this document as part of the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Postal receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court used this document to verify the sending of the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court considered this as evidence of receipt of the legal notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4