O.S. No. 771/2017

Case between Anoop Puthumadom et al vs Subash Chandrabose et al regarding realization of money

Court

Munsiff Court, Ernakulam

Judge

Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany

Order Date

2025-12-19

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a petition by the defendant Subash Chandrabose regarding a commission report related to the cost of construction work. The plaintiffs, Anoop Puthumadom and Priya Anoop, are seeking to realize money they claim was improperly received by the defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The petition by the defendant to remit back the commission report was dismissed by the court. The court found no merit in the arguments presented by the defendant's counsel.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The petition by the defendant to remit back the commission report was dismissed by the court. The court found no merit in the arguments presented by the defendant's counsel.

Key Reasoning:
The court concluded that the commission report was adequate and required no further examination.

Why Defendant Won:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

The report was deemed sufficient and there was no necessity to remit it back for further ascertainment.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Anoop Puthumadom
Party Age: 51
Relation: null

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Priya Anoop
Party Age: 45
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Subash Chandrabose
Party Age: 56
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

True copy of Contract written by defendant

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sanal K M
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Anup T Paul
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sreekumar G Chelur
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Eldhose M Varghese
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

Petition to remit back the commission report for further assessment.

Evidence:

In light of the above discussion I am satisfied that the above commission report and plan need not be remitted back.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Contract

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

True copy of the agreement executed between the parties regarding the construction.

Reference:

Ext.A1

Document Type: Commission Report

Submitted By: Court