Case Summary
This case involves a petition by the defendant Subash Chandrabose regarding a commission report related to the cost of construction work. The plaintiffs, Anoop Puthumadom and Priya Anoop, are seeking to realize money they claim was improperly received by the defendant.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court concluded that the commission report was adequate and required no further examination.
The court concluded that the commission report was adequate and required no further examination.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Anoop Puthumadom (51 years years)
Flat 11, Building 834, Road 3523, Manama 335, Um Al Hassam, Kingdom of Bahrain
Priya Anoop (45 years years)
Flat 11, Building 834, Road 3523, Manama 335, Um Al Hassam, Kingdom of Bahrain
Defendants
Subash Chandrabose (56 years years)
Lakshmi Niketan, House No. II, Narayanan Ashan Road, Ponnurunni, Vyttila, Kochi
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Petition to remit back the commission report for further assessment.
Evidence:
In light of the above discussion I am satisfied that the above commission report and plan need not be remitted back.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Contract
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of the agreement executed between the parties regarding the construction.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Commission report dated 03.03.2020 related to IA 7524/2017.
Reference:
Ext.C1 series