Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 66 /2020

Case between Anoop N.S vs M/s Soman’s Leisure Tours Indian Pvt. Ltd. regarding suit filed under Section 26 read with Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure.

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-09-12
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Anoop N.S, filed a suit against M/s Soman’s Leisure Tours Indian Pvt. Ltd. The case was heard on September 12, 2024, but the plaintiff was absent and did not file any proof affidavit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to present himself and did not file the required proof affidavit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to present himself and did not file the required proof affidavit.
Supporting Evidence
The matter was listed for evidence today. No proof affidavit is seen filed also. Hence this court is satisfied that plaintiff is not interested to proceed with the suit further.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Suit is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anoop N.S
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Soman’s Leisure Tours Indian Pvt. Ltd.
Relation
represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Pramod Kochuthommen.E
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Manu Roy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bindu K.N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence this court is satisfied that plaintiff is not interested to proceed with the suit further.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Anoop N.S vs M/s Soman’s Leisure Tours Indian Pvt. Ltd. regarding suit filed under Section 26 read with Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure.
Case Code Year
Case between Anoop N.S vs M/s Soman’s Leisure Tours Indian Pvt. Ltd. regarding suit filed under Section 26 read with Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won