Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.1062/2023

Case between Anoop D vs D D Diamond Valley Apartment Owners Association et al regarding temporary injunction

Court
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-01-16
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Anoop D is seeking a temporary injunction against D D Diamond Valley Apartment Owners Association and others to prevent them from forcibly evicting him from properties he claims to lease for his beauty salon. The defendants argue that he has no rightful claim to the properties and that their actions are justified.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition due to insufficient evidence that the plaintiff had any rights to the properties in question. The defendants demonstrated that the plaintiff had failed to prove a prima facie case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to present a prima facie case showing entitlement to occupy the properties.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is dismissed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, parties are directed to bear their respective costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Anoop D (34 years years) Ambadi House, Karikkod, Mulakkulam, Kottayam, Pin- 686610

Defendants

D D Diamond Valley Apartment Owners Association (Age not specified years) Edachira, Kakkanad Unnikrishnan P P (62 years years) Perumkarukayil Mayithara P O, Cherthala South, Alappuzha Sreenivasan (65 years years) Painakkil Veetil, BSNL Road, Kusumagiri P O, Kakkanad Kara, Kakkanad Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Seeking injunction against respondents from forcibly evicting petitioner from plaint A and B schedule properties.
Evidence:
This court is satisfied that plaintiff has failed to prove his case.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rental and Operational Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed between plaintiff and 1st defendant with respect to plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of rent agreement between Santhikrishna and 3rd defendant dated 03.06.2022.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sale Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sale agreement entered between Santhikrishna and plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Copy of rent agreement between 3rd defendant and Mrs. Santhi Krishna.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Lease Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Copy of Lease deed between Mrs. Santhi Krishna and Mr. S B Hari.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: License
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Copy of License issued from Thrikkakara Municipality to Mrs. Santhi Krishna.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Rent Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Rent receipt issued by 1st defendant to daughter of 2nd defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Rent Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Rent receipt issued by 1st defendant to daughter of 2nd defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Newspaper Article
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Copy of newspaper article in 'Kerala Kaumudi'.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Article
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
True copy of article in 'Success Kerala' in January, 2023.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Rent agreement entered into between 3rd defendant and Mrs. Santhi Krishna (daughter of 2nd defendant).
Reference:
Ext.B8

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases