Case Summary
Annie, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Shanty Santhosh and Ajay P Sathosh regarding the matters related to Section 26 and Order 7 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court ruled on the admissibility of the plaint.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed IA 6/25 but rejected the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 Code of Civil Procedure.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Both sides represented. IA 6/25 is allowed. Plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Annie
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shanty Santhosh
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ajay P Sathosh
- Party Age
- 29
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Santhy M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Harish R Menon
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aleena Sebastian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 Code of Civil Procedure.
Evidence:
Plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Annie vs Shanty Santhosh et al regarding rejection of plaint
Case Code Year
Case between Annie vs Shanty Santhosh et al regarding rejection of plaint