Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
E.P. No. 32/2025

Case between Annam Mavely vs Diaguncart Technologies Pvt. Ltd. regarding decree execution

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-09-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Annam Mavely is the petitioner, represented by her power of attorney holder, Santosh Joseph Mavely, seeking execution of a decree against Diaguncart Technologies Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Director, Teena Chacko. The court found that the decree was satisfied.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court determined that the decree in question had been satisfied and thus ordered the execution petition to be marked as satisfied.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court determined that the decree in question had been satisfied and thus ordered the execution petition to be marked as satisfied.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the decree reported satisfied.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the decree reported satisfied.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that no further steps were necessary as the decree was satisfied.

Judgment Evidence:

Decree reported satisfied.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Annam Mavely
Party Age
76
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Santosh Joseph Mavely
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Diaguncart Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Teena Chacko
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dinesh Mathew J. Murikan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mohammed Thayib N.M
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ria Varghese
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
H. Nujumudeen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Antony Shyju
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Simi M Jacob
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sherin Achu Ninan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adhira Saliha N.P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Annam Mavely vs Diaguncart Technologies Pvt. Ltd. regarding decree execution
Case Code Year
Case between Annam Mavely vs Diaguncart Technologies Pvt. Ltd. regarding decree execution

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Mahendra Kumar. C vs Suresh. V. Varghese regarding E.P No. 199/2023
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Cornation Curries Private Limited vs Happy Varghese et al regarding E.P No. 31/2020
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Shamughapuram Co-operative Bank Limited vs Sumathy Vijayan regarding execution petition
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Manager, DTDC Express Limited et al regarding decree satisfaction
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won