Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 110/2023

Case between Anjana R vs Cyril Raphael, Arun regarding suit dismissals

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-04-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Anjana R filed a suit against Cyril Raphael and Arun, but was absent at the hearing. The court dismissed the case for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence at the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence at the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's continuous absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's continuous absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff absent, not represented. No representation continuously for the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anjana R
Party Age
30
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Cyril Raphael
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Arun
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.P.Santhosh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Suraj Krishna B.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Febin Raj T.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Manoj Vasu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Deepa C
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Simi V.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Anjana R vs Cyril Raphael, Arun regarding suit dismissals
Case Code Year
Case between Anjana R vs Cyril Raphael, Arun regarding suit dismissals

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won