Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 148 / 2020

Case between Anith Kumar vs Hindustan Liquids Pvt. Ltd et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-07-23
Duration
approximately-6 years 10 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Anith Kumar filed a suit against Hindustan Liquids Pvt. Ltd and its representatives for unpaid salary and associated claims. The plaintiff alleged unlawful termination and sought reimbursement for unpaid dues.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff partially, granting a total of Rs.73,310/- along with interest. The defendants were held responsible for the unpaid salary and related claims.
Judgment Favored
Partial
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay Rs.73,310/- along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff proved continued service till July 2019 and established unpaid dues.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendant shall pay Rs.73,310/-(Rupees Seventy three thousand three hundred and ten only) along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Anith Kumar (52 years years) ‘Devikripa’ Mekkara House, Thekkumbhagam, Tripunithura, Ernakulam

Defendants

Hindustan Liquids Pvt. Ltd (Age not specified years) 470A, 4th Floor, Astral Center, N M Joshi Marg, Chinchpokli (W), Mumbai – 400 011 Anil Popat (Age not specified years) 470A, 4th Floor, Astral Center, N M Joshi Marg, Chinchpokli (W), Mumbai – 400 011

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought to recover unpaid salary and other claims.
Evidence:
The court is satisfied that plaintiff has proved his case, that he continued in service till July 2019.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Offer letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document shows the terms of the plaintiff's appointment and salary structure.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The email communication related to the plaintiff's salary demands and employment confirmation.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another email communication relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
An email that relates to the plaintiff's employment situation.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
An email concerning salary demands.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A formal notice issued by the plaintiff's lawyer demanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Termination Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The termination letter that is subject to dispute in the case.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Resolution
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
A resolution passed by the defendant's Board of Directors.
Reference:
Ext.B1(a)
Document Type: ID Card
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Identification documentation from the defendant's side.
Reference:
Ext.B1(b)
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The oral testimonies presented by the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 09/03/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases