Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 148 / 2020

Case between Anith Kumar vs Hindustan Liquids Pvt. Ltd et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-07-23
Duration
approximately-6 years 10 months
Case Closed
Wed, 07/23/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Anith Kumar filed a suit against Hindustan Liquids Pvt. Ltd and its representatives for unpaid salary and associated claims. The plaintiff alleged unlawful termination and sought reimbursement for unpaid dues.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff partially, granting a total of Rs.73,310/- along with interest. The defendants were held responsible for the unpaid salary and related claims.
Judgment Favored
Partial
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay Rs.73,310/- along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff partially, granting a total of Rs.73,310/- along with interest. The defendants were held responsible for the unpaid salary and related claims.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff proved continued service till July 2019 and established unpaid dues.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff proved continued service till July 2019 and established unpaid dues.
Supporting Evidence
From the evidence on record court is satisfied that plaintiff has proved his case, that he continued in service till July 2019.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendant shall pay Rs.73,310/-(Rupees Seventy three thousand three hundred and ten only) along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anith Kumar
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hindustan Liquids Pvt. Ltd
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anil Popat
Plaintiffs Documents
True copy of offer letter, True copy of email communications, True copy of lawyer notice, Acknowledgment card, Termination letter with postal cover
Defendants Documents
True copy of resolution passed at the Board of Directors meeting, I D Card

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
N Retheesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Suma Retheesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aravind Ajith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mathew Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C A Majeed
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Asif K H
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Molty Majeed
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought to recover unpaid salary and other claims.
Evidence:
The court is satisfied that plaintiff has proved his case, that he continued in service till July 2019.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Offer letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document shows the terms of the plaintiff's appointment and salary structure.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The email communication related to the plaintiff's salary demands and employment confirmation.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another email communication relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
An email that relates to the plaintiff's employment situation.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
An email concerning salary demands.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A formal notice issued by the plaintiff's lawyer demanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Termination Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The termination letter that is subject to dispute in the case.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Resolution
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
A resolution passed by the defendant's Board of Directors.
Reference:
Ext.B1(a)
Document Type: ID Card
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Identification documentation from the defendant's side.
Reference:
Ext.B1(b)
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The oral testimonies presented by the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of salary
Case Code
Case between Anith Kumar vs Hindustan Liquids Pvt. Ltd et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Anith Kumar vs Hindustan Liquids Pvt. Ltd et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 09/03/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/23/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won