Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Original Suit No. 76 OF 2000

Case between Animangalath Kalliani et al vs Kattingal Kuttan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-12-21
Duration
19 years 11 months 11 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Involves Animangalath Kalliani and others suing Kattingal Kuttan and others for perpetual injunction due to theft of coconuts from the plaintiff's property. Defendants disputed the ownership and rights over the property, leading to a trial.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiffs granted relief with partial decree for perpetual prohibitory injunction and costs awarded against defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction and costs
Case Type
Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiffs proved title, possession, and right to relief. Defendants lacked evidence and rights over the property.

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Animangalath Kalliani @ Sinnamalu Amma (65 Years years) Ozhur amsom, Eranallur desom, Tirur Taluk Animangalath Paru Amma's children (Age not specified years) Ozhur amsom, Eranallur desom, Tirur Taluk Thadathil Meenakshi Amma's daughter Ammini (37 Years years) Ozhur amsom, Eranallur desom, Tirur Taluk Deepa T. (27 Years years) Ozhur amsom, Eranallur desom, Tirur Taluk Others (Age not specified years)

Defendants

Kattingal Kuttan (25 Years years) Eranhikkal Bhama (22 Years years) Kunnathaparambil Satheesan (25 Years years) Kelappurath Karthikeyan (19 Years years) Madathil Krishnan (35 Years years) Laksham Veedu Colony, Onakkad

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraining defendants from trespassing and interfering with plaintiff's enjoyment of the property
Evidence:
Plaintiff proved title and possession over property
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to realize costs from defendants
Evidence:
Court rule that costs will follow the event

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Purchase Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents proving ownership and possession of property
Reference:
A1 to A5
Document Type: Extract of Permanent Register
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Defendant's evidence for property ownership
Reference:
B1
Document Type: Certified Copy of Adangal
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Defendant's evidence for property ownership
Reference:
B2
Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Documents submitted by the court for property identification
Reference:
C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6

Quick Facts

Location
TIRUR
Case Filed
Sat, 01/01/2000 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases