Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.294/2017

Case between Anilkumar vs Chandrika regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-02-03
Duration
Case Code No.
294
Case Closed
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Anilkumar is the plaintiff who filed a suit against Chandrika. The case was heard but the plaintiff was not ready to adduce evidence, leading to the suit being dismissed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit stands dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to adduce evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit stands dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to adduce evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was not ready to adduce evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was not ready to adduce evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was not ready to adduce evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

As case is included list for trial and no sufficient reason stated to not adducing evidence. Suits stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anilkumar
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chandrika
Party Age
60
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Muramel A.N.Shaji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Athul Babu.S.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. K.Reshmi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. C.Sudheendra Nath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. D.N.Sabarigirish
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Case dismissed as the plaintiff was not ready to adduce evidence.
Evidence:
As case is included list for trial and no sufficient reason stated to not adducing evidence. Suits stands dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2017

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won