Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.576/2021

Case between Anilkumar Palathinkal vs M.R. Prasadkumar regarding dismissal for default

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-06
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs Anilkumar Palathinkal and Mary Anilkumar against defendants M.R. Prasadkumar and Beena Prasadkumar. The plaintiffs were absent and their suit was dismissed for default due to lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiffs were absent and showed no interest in proceeding. The defendants were present.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiffs were absent and showed no interest in proceeding. The defendants were present.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs repeatedly failed to appear and represent their case.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiffs repeatedly failed to appear and represent their case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Plaintiffs have no representation repeatedly.

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff absent. No representation. Defendant represented. Plaintiffs have no representation repeatedly. Satisfied plaintiffs are not interested in proceeding with suit. Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anilkumar Palathinkal
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mary Anilkumar
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M.R. Prasadkumar
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Beena Prasadkumar
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Varghese.C. Kuriakose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ranimol.M.T.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Susanth Shaji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiffs' absence and no representation.
Evidence:
Satisfied plaintiffs are not interested in proceeding with suit. Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Anilkumar Palathinkal vs M.R. Prasadkumar regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Anilkumar Palathinkal vs M.R. Prasadkumar regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won