Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 945/2025

Case between Anil Pavunny Elias vs K.P.Ramesh @ Karthikeyan regarding interim prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-11-11
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Anil Pavunny Elias filed a petition seeking an interim prohibitory injunction against K.P.Ramesh @ Karthikeyan. The case involves a dispute over property where the plaintiff alleges interference in his ability to sell the property after a failed sale agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendant and his agents from obstructing the plaintiff's use and enjoyment of the property until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
An order of interim injunction was passed restraining the respondent from interfering with the plaintiff's enjoyment of the property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner established a prima facie case and balance of convenience in his favor.

Judgment Evidence:

An order of interim injunction is passed restraining the respondent or any persons claiming through or under him from obstructing or interfering with the user, enjoyment and possession of injunction A schedule property by the plaintiff in any manner, until further orders.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Anil Pavunny Elias (63 years years) Cheruvathur House, Ratna Lane, South Janatha Road, Palarivattom, Poonithura Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam - 682 025

Defendants

K.P.Ramesh @ Karthikeyan (around 65 years years) Kuravamparambil House, Manakunnam Village, Udayamperoor Desom, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam - 682 307

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
An order of interim injunction was passed restraining the respondent from obstructing or interfering with the user, enjoyment and possession of the property by the plaintiff until the final disposal of the suit.
Evidence:
In view of these facts, an order of interim injunction is passed as against the respondent restraining the respondent or persons claiming through or under him or his agents and men from in obstructing or interfering with the user, enjoyment and possession of injunction A schedule property (plaint A schedule property) by the plaintiff in any manner, till the final disposal of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement of Sale
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the agreement between the plaintiff and defendant regarding the sale of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report was filed as part of the consideration of the petition.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases