Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1050 of 2018

Case between Anil Kumar et al vs M/s. Skyline Builders regarding dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Rejani Thankappan
Order Date
2024-01-04
Duration
approximately-5 years 0 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Anil Kumar and others, initiated a suit against M/s. Skyline Builders. The court heard the case on January 4, 2024, but the plaintiffs were absent and the suit was dismissed for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case due to the absence of the plaintiffs. There were no costs awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case due to the absence of the plaintiffs. There were no costs awarded.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed for default. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anil Kumar
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Arun.P
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bibin George
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Skyline Builders
Party Age
55
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R.Vijayakumari
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Remadevi K.P.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.Viswanathan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shibu Joseph
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anupama.R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Gayathri Krishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anoopa M.J
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sanu.S.Malakeel
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ashwin Antony
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Prerith Philip
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Princy Jolly
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ajith Viswanathan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Anil Kumar et al vs M/s. Skyline Builders regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Anil Kumar et al vs M/s. Skyline Builders regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 01/04/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won