Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1079/2017

Case between Andul Rahim T.N vs Rajagiri Christhu Jayanthi Public School et al regarding execution petition.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-07-31
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Andul Rahim T.N as the decree holder and Rajagiri Christhu Jayanthi Public School along with its director as the judgment debtors. The execution petition was dismissed as there was no decree in force.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The execution petition was dismissed due to lack of a valid decree to execute.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed due to lack of a valid decree to execute.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was dismissed as there was no decree in force that could be executed.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was dismissed as there was no decree in force that could be executed.
Supporting Evidence
Hence there is evidently no decree in force that can be executed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence E.P dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Andul Rahim T.N
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajagiri Christhu Jayanthi Public School
Relation
Rep. by its Director
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Father Augustine Mampalli
Relation
Director
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Certified copy of judgment dated 20.03.2024 in O.S 1079/17

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B. M Ajith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Satheesh Babu G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Zakkir Hussain
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nikhil K Gopinath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Execution Petition dismissed as there was no decree in force.
Evidence:
Hence there is evidently no decree in force that can be executed. Hence E.P dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified Copy of Judgment
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The court used the certified copy of the judgment dated 20.03.2024 to determine that there was no decree in force that could be executed.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Andul Rahim T.N vs Rajagiri Christhu Jayanthi Public School et al regarding execution petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Andul Rahim T.N vs Rajagiri Christhu Jayanthi Public School et al regarding execution petition.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Mrs. New India Engineering Stores vs National Tools Palace et al regarding execution petition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Rhine Biogenics (P) Ltd vs Century Associates regarding execution petition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Maya Printers et al vs Afsal B regarding decree execution
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Manager, DTDC Express Limited et al regarding decree satisfaction
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won