Case Summary
The case involves Amudini.V as the plaintiff and B. Rajan as the defendant. The plaintiff's counsel stated that the suit is not pressed, resulting in the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court delivered the judgment stating that the suit is dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff's counsel.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Amudini.V
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- B. Rajan
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.S. Satheesh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.K. Rajeev Punnapuram
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S. Asokan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Sangeetha R.V.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Amritha S.R
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Plaintiff counsel endorsed that suit is not pressed. Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022