Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 988/2024

Case between Ammini vs Prasanna K.S regarding non-prosecution of suit.

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-01-23
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ammini, the plaintiff, claims she was unaware of the case filed against Prasanna K.S, the defendant. She stated that she did not sign the plaint and is not interested in proceeding with the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case for non-prosecution as the plaintiff was not interested in proceeding and had filed a submission to that effect.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case for non-prosecution as the plaintiff was not interested in proceeding and had filed a submission to that effect.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff expressed no interest in pursuing the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff expressed no interest in pursuing the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has submitted that this case is filed without her knowledge and that she has not signed in the plaint. She has expressed that she is not interested in proceeding with the suit...

Judgment Evidence:

Dismissed for non prosecution (Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 23rd day of January, 2025).

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ammini
Party Age
67
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prasanna K.S
Party Age
64
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dilish K. John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Reshma Mohan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.N Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Yedukrishnan S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Medha Maria Mathew
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aiswarya Unnikrishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ranjitha C. R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Dismissed for non prosecution
Evidence:
she has not signed in the plaint. She has expressed that she is not interested in proceeding with the suit and has filed a submission making these averments.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ammini vs Prasanna K.S regarding non-prosecution of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Ammini vs Prasanna K.S regarding non-prosecution of suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won