Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 132/2020

Case between Ammini Madhavan vs Velayudhan regarding suit and counter claim

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-09-04
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ammini Madhavan filed a suit against Velayudhan. The suit and counter claim were rejected due to non-payment of court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that there was no balance court fee paid and rejected both the suit and the counter claim.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court rejected the suit due to non-compliance with court fee requirements.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit and Counter Claim rejected. (Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 04th day of September, 2024).

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Ammini Madhavan (62 years) Kunnarathara House, Kunnara Nadama Village, Kanayannoor Taluk, Eroor West P.O, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 306

Defendants

Velayudhan (68 years) Puthukkayil House, Nadama Village, Nadama Desom, Kanayannoor Taluk, Tripunithura, Ernakulam District, PIN – 682 301

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit and Counter Claim rejected due to no balance court fee paid.
Evidence:
No Balance Court Fee Paid in Suit and Counter Claim despite innumerous chances and posting as last chance no further time.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases