Case Summary
Aminu, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Hamza seeking declaration and eviction. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff's counsel had no instruction.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not granted - Suit dismissed
Case Type
Civil Suit - Declaration and Eviction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as plaintiff's counsel had no instruction.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aminu
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- Daughter of Cholakkal Pottachola Koya
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hamza
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- Son of Cholakkal Pottachola Koya
Plaintiffs Documents
Vakalath
Defendants Documents
Not available
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C.Nandakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Soumya Kooliparambil
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Seeking declaration and eviction
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Vakalath
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to represent the plaintiff in the case.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Declaration and Eviction
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Aminu vs Hamza regarding declaration and eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Aminu vs Hamza regarding declaration and eviction