Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.54 OF 2016

Case between Aminakutty et al vs Hamza regarding tenancy

Court
RENT CONTROLLER OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.,B.A, LL.B.
Order Date
2017-02-22
Duration
1 year and 5 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Four petitioners sought relief under the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act through a compromise where the respondent vacated the premises and petitioners took possession.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The Rent Controller allowed the Rent Control Petition based on a lawful compromise where the respondent vacated the premises.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allowed Rent Control Petition as per compromise terms
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The Rent Control Petition was allowed based on a lawful compromise.

Judgment Evidence:

Compromise shall form part of the order.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Aminakutty (63 years) Kizhakkeparambil House, Kuttippuram amsom, deosm, Tirur Taluk Ismail (39 years) Kizhakkeparambil House, Kuttippuram amsom, deosm, Tirur Taluk Misiriyya (35 years) Kizhakkeparambil House, Kuttippuram amsom, deosm, Tirur Taluk Moideenkutty (29 years) Kizhakkeparambil House, Kuttippuram amsom, deosm, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Hamza. P (65 years) Pottarath House, Kuttipuram amsom, desom, & Post, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Rent Control Relief
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Allowed Rent Control Petition as per compromise terms
Evidence:
Compromise shall form part of the order.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: IA. 541/2017
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Filed by both petitioners and respondent.
Reference:
Document Type: IA. 541/2017
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Filed by both petitioners and respondent.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Wed, 02/17/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases