Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.851/2021

Case between Ambrose vs Elizabath regarding suit dismissal for default

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-02-29
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs include Ambrose and Rossy, who filed a suit. The case involved repeated absences of the plaintiffs, leading to a dismissal for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of interest in proceeding with the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of interest in proceeding with the case.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs were repeatedly absent and did not show interest in pursuing the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs were repeatedly absent and did not show interest in pursuing the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Satisfied plaintiff is not interested in proceeding with suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default. Pronounced by me, in open court on this the 29th day of February, 2024.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ambrose
Party Age
79
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rossy
Party Age
83
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Elizabath
Party Age
97
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mary Antony
Party Age
67
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Laly
Party Age
65
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Moly
Party Age
60
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Treesa
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
N.P. Sunilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Manju Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anil Prasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C.N. Sreekumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Beyon.T.Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arya.K.K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ambrose vs Elizabath regarding suit dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Ambrose vs Elizabath regarding suit dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won