OS. No. 334/2018

Case between Ambika vs Chellappan Pillai et al regarding Injunction

Court

THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM

Judge

Smt. Ragi.S.

Order Date

2025-01-30

Duration

Case Closed

Thu, 01/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a suit filed by the plaintiff Ambika for an injunction. The plaintiff was absent during the hearings, leading to the suit being dismissed for non-prosecution.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Injunction

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation during the hearings.

Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was consistently absent.

Why Defendant Won:
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was consistently absent.

Supporting Evidence

the plaintiff remained absent

Judgment Evidence:

the case posted for appearance of plaintiff, as the plaintiff remained absent, suit dismissed for non prosecution.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Ambika
Party Age: 56
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Chellappan Pillai
Party Age: 80
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Ponnammayamma
Party Age: 65
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sindhu
Party Age: 35
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Raveendran Pillai
Party Age: 40
Relation: H/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: K.Retnakumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: K.G.Bindu
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Injunction sought by the plaintiff was not granted due to absence.

Evidence:

suit dismissed for non prosecution.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification