Case Summary
The plaintiff, Aman, is involved in a suit for the realization of money against defendants Subin and Fathima. The court rejected the plaintiff's suit due to their absence and lack of compliance with previous orders.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaintiff's suit due to absence and non-compliance with prior order.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not comply with court orders.
The plaintiff was absent and did not comply with court orders.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not comply with court orders.
The plaintiff was absent and did not comply with court orders.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff absent represented. No BCF remitted. Not comply order dated 11/04/2025.
Judgment Evidence:
Plaint rejected. Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 12th day of June, 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aman
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Subin
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Fathima
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Nazeer Kakkanttayyam
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Plaintiff's request for realization of money
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent represented. No BCF remitted. Not comply order dated 11/04/2025. Plaint rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Realization of Money
Case Code
Case between Aman vs Subin et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Aman vs Subin et al regarding realization of money