Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1558 of 2019

Case between Alice Aleyas vs Cochin Corporation et al regarding rejection of suit due to absence and non-remittance of court fee.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Smt. Rejani Thankappan
Order Date
2024-01-23
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 01/23/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Alice Aleyas is the plaintiff in this case against the Cochin Corporation and others. The case was dismissed because the plaintiff was absent and did not remit the balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the suit due to the continuous absence of the plaintiff and the failure to remit the balance court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the suit due to the continuous absence of the plaintiff and the failure to remit the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is rejected.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Alice Aleyas
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Cochin Corporation
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Secretary, Cochin Corporation
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri. V.M Sakeer Babu
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Paul.K.Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jalaluddeen Mohammed K.P.S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shoban George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.G Suresh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aswathy Krishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and non-remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Since Balance Court Fee is not remitted. Suit is rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Alice Aleyas vs Cochin Corporation et al regarding rejection of suit due to absence and non-remittance of court fee.
Case Code Year
Case between Alice Aleyas vs Cochin Corporation et al regarding rejection of suit due to absence and non-remittance of court fee.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Tue, 01/23/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Cochin Corporation

Similar Cases

Case between Manojkumar.C vs The Cochin Corporation et al regarding balance court fee
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won