Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. 72/2021

Case between Alex Baby vs Santhosh Eappen regarding Cheque dishonor under Section 138 of NI Act

Court
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-12-30
Duration
approximately-2 years 11 days
Case Code No.
72
Case Closed
Tue, 12/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The complainant, Alex Baby, filed a case against Santhosh Eappen for dishonoring a cheque issued for repayment of a loan. The court found the accused guilty and imposed a sentence for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court convicted the accused Santhosh Eappen for committing the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced him to simple imprisonment and a fine.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Simple imprisonment for 2 months and a fine of ₹25,28,800/-
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court convicted the accused Santhosh Eappen for committing the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced him to simple imprisonment and a fine.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The complainant established that the accused issued the cheque in discharge of a legally enforceable debt.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court concluded that the complainant could establish that the accused had handed over Ext.P2 cheque and the accused had admitted his signature in Ext.P2.

Judgment Evidence:

The accused is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two (2) months and to pay a fine of ₹25,28,800/- (Rupees twenty five lakh twenty eight thousand and eight hundred only).

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Alex Baby
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhosh Eappen
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheque No:404385 for ₹26,28,800/-, Promissory Note, Legal Notice.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sony Sebastian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anu K Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The accused is ordered to pay the amount of ₹25,28,800/- as compensation.
Evidence:
The entire fine amount of ₹25,28,800/- shall be paid to the complainant as compensation under Section 357(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Relief Type: Imprisonment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The accused is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment.
Evidence:
The accused is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two (2) months and to pay a fine of ₹25,28,800/-.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque dated 02.06.2021 was issued by the accused in discharge of a legally enforceable debt.
Reference:
P2
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A letter issued by the accused regarding the transaction between the complainant and the accused.
Reference:
P3
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The promissory note executed by the accused promising to pay the amount owed to the complainant.
Reference:
P4
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The memo regarding the dishonor of the cheque due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
P5
Document Type: Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice sent to the accused, signifying the statutory requirements compliance.
Reference:
P6
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The postal receipt evidencing the sending of the notice to the accused.
Reference:
P7
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The acknowledgment card serves as proof of delivery of the notice to the accused.
Reference:
P8
Document Type: Certificate under Section 65B (4) of the Indian Evidence Act
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This certificate validates the electronic records submitted in court.
Reference:
X1
Document Type: Statement of SBI Account
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The bank statement that shows the account details of the accused.
Reference:
X2
Document Type: Statement of SBI Account
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Another statement of the unavailability of funds in the accused's account.
Reference:
X3

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2021

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Imprisonment Involved
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act
Imprisonment Duration
2 months

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Sat, 08/28/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 12/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. vs Mr. John V.V. regarding offence under Section 138 of N.I Act
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between M/s. M.M Publications Ltd. vs P S Mohammed Basheer regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-V
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Sanju Raju vs Rajesh P.R. regarding dishonor of cheque
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Sanju Raju vs Rajesh P.R. regarding offence punishable U/s. 138 of N.I Act
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Shriram Transport Finance Co.Ltd vs Abey regarding dishonor of cheque
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won