Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 115/2023

Case between Akbar N.S. vs Jincy K.K regarding rent control petition

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2024-12-06
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Akbar N.S. filed a rent control petition against Jincy K.K. The case was dismissed for default as the petitioner did not represent themselves in court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the rent control petition due to the petitioner's non-appearance and lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, rent control petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Akbar N.S. (52 years) Nikarthil House, A.K.G Road, Vellakkal Bye Lane Road, Toll Edappally, Ernakulum District. PIN – 682024

Defendants

Jincy K.K (46 years) Manjayil House, M.L.A Road, 33/1086/Vazhakkala Village, Thrikkakara P.O., Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulum District. PIN - 682021

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The rent control petition is dismissed for default due to no representation from the petitioner.
Evidence:
Hence, rent control petition is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases