Case Summary
A.Joy filed a suit against Leena. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, resulting in the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court concluded the hearing and dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not produce evidence.
The plaintiff was absent and did not produce evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not produce evidence.
The plaintiff was absent and did not produce evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. IA 1/25 filed. However no steps nor documents produced.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit stands dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- A.Joy
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Leena
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S. Balachandran Kulasekharam
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Vakkom D. Sajeev
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit stands dismissed due to Plaintiff not ready to adduce evidence.
Evidence:
However no steps nor documents produced . Hence IA 1/25 dismissed. As Plaintiff not ready to adduce evidence today. Suit stands dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between A.Joy vs Leena regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between A.Joy vs Leena regarding dismissal of suit