Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1953/2022

Case between Ajithkumar.P vs Rani Sasidharan et al regarding partition and separate possession.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -III
Judge
Smt. Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-02-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Ajithkumar.P, seeks to amend pleadings due to the death of the second defendant and to correct a typographical error. The case involves a suit for partition and separate possession.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the amendment sought by the plaintiff for just and proper disposal of the suit. The amendment was deemed necessary due to the death of the second defendant and a typographical error.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the amendment sought by the plaintiff for just and proper disposal of the suit. The amendment was deemed necessary due to the death of the second defendant and a typographical error.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the amendment is necessary for just and proper disposal and would not cause prejudice to the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
As the suit is in the pre-trial stage, I am of the opinion that no prejudice would be caused to defendant in carryout to the amendment.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence allowed. Carry out amendment forthwith.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajithkumar.P
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rani Sasidharan
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Indira Bai
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.R. Anandakuttan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Rajeev
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. A. Abdulkharim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Sameerkharim
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Amendment to the pleadings regarding the change in shares of the plaintiff due to the death of the second defendant and correction of a typographical error in the TC number.
Evidence:
Hence allowed. Carry out amendment forthwith.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ajithkumar.P vs Rani Sasidharan et al regarding partition and separate possession.
Case Code Year
Case between Ajithkumar.P vs Rani Sasidharan et al regarding partition and separate possession.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won