Case Summary
The case involves Ajithkumar as the plaintiff and Smitha M.A and others as defendants. The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of both parties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as neither the plaintiff nor the defendants showed up for the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Judgment Evidence:
suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ajithkumar
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Smitha M.A
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Devika S Ajith
- Party Age
- 17
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Diya S Ajith
- Party Age
- 14
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shiras Aliyar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.R.Nandakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default
Evidence:
Not complied with the submission by the plaintiff hence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ajithkumar vs Smitha M.A et al regarding suit dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Ajithkumar vs Smitha M.A et al regarding suit dismissal for default