Case Summary
Ajitha. T R is the petitioner seeking to restore a petition under CPC. The respondents are Santhosh.M and Sujitha T.R.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Unknown
Final Judgment
No
The petitioner was absent and expressed no interest in continuing the case. The case was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner was absent and did not show interest in continuing the case.
The petitioner was absent and did not show interest in continuing the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner was absent and expressed no interest in continuing the case.
Judgment Evidence:
O R D E R Petitioner absent, represented. Submitted that petitioner not interested to continue case. BCF not remitted. Dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ajitha. T R
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Santhosh.M
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sujitha T.R
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Baiju Kumar. D.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Dismissed for default due to petitioner's absence and lack of interest to continue the case.
Evidence:
Petitioner absent, represented. Submitted that petitioner not interested to continue case. BCF not remitted. Dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Unknown
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ajitha. T R vs Santhosh.M, Sujitha T.R regarding restoration of petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Ajitha. T R vs Santhosh.M, Sujitha T.R regarding restoration of petition.