Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 307/2025

Case between Ajeesh P S vs Rajimol C R regarding ad interim injunction

Court
MUNSIFF COURT, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-08-19
Duration
Case Code No.
307
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition for an ad interim injunction filed by Ajeesh P S against Rajimol C R. The court has found a prima facie case warranting the injunction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad interim injunction preventing the respondent from inducting any strangers to the scheduled property without consent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad interim injunction granted.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad interim injunction preventing the respondent from inducting any strangers to the scheduled property without consent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court was satisfied that a prima facie case has been established.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been made out and delay in issuing notice would defeat the very purpose of the above application.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an ad interim injunction is granted and the respondent shall not induct any strangers to the petition scheduled property and building there in without the consent of the petitioner until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajeesh P S
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajimol C R
Party Age
45
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Dimple Raj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
An ad interim injunction is granted and the respondent shall not induct any strangers to the petition scheduled property and building there in without the consent of the petitioner until further orders.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been made out and delay in issuing notice would defeat the very purpose of the above application. Hence an ad interim injunction is granted and the respondent shall not induct any strangers to the petition scheduled property and building there in without the consent of the petitioner until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of India vs Nishana K C regarding decree of suit
Munsiff Court/Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Asset Sapphire Apartment Owners Association vs Amal Shaji et al regarding petition for document production
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Aniyamma Joseph et al vs Akhil Joseph et al regarding civil matters.
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ajitha Jibi vs Sherin Mathew et al regarding compromise petition.
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Surendran et al vs Daniel. K.P. et al regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won