Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1025/2019

Case between Ajay Shankar vs A.R.Muhammad Sulfikkar et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-07-10
Duration
approximately-6 years
Case Closed
Thu, 07/10/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ajay Shankar filed a suit against A.R.Muhammad Sulfikkar and others. The case was dismissed due to lack of representation from both parties.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The case was dismissed as neither the plaintiff nor any defendants were present for the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed as neither the plaintiff nor any defendants were present for the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

The court on the same day delivered the following: Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajay Shankar
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A.C. City Projects Private Limited
Party Age
50
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A.C.Orion Apartment Owners Association
Party Age
52
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. P Jacob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anu V. Kuttan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mariyam Jacob
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Soumya C.D
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R. Sudheeshkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.O. Xavier
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R. Divakaran
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of readiness for evidence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff represented. Not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ajay Shankar vs A.R.Muhammad Sulfikkar et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Ajay Shankar vs A.R.Muhammad Sulfikkar et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 07/10/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won