Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No 1006/2019

Case between Ajay Johns vs K.V. Viswambaran regarding realization of money

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-21
Duration
approximately-4 years 8 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ajay Johns, a practicing lawyer, filed a suit against K.V. Viswambaran for the recovery of advocate fees and other expenses related to a previous case. The defendant was alleged to have evaded payment after an award was issued in favor of the defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 1,00,000 along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay Rs.1,00,000 along with interest at the rate of 9% from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a case and was entitled to realize the claimed amount.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendant shall pay Rs.1,00,000 (Rupees One lakh only) along with interest @ 9% from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Ajay Johns (47 years years) Parayil House, Kaloor.P.O., Pin – 682 017

Defendants

K.V. Viswambaran (84 years years) Saya Villa, Koonamthai, Edappally .P.O., Kochi – 24

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.1,00,000/- with interest from defendant.
Evidence:
I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.1,00,000/- with interest from defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of award
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that plaintiff was the lawyer for the defendant in OP (MV) 39/2015 before Hon’ble MACT, Ernakulam.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter issued by the defendant to the MACT, Ernakulam.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter issued by the defendant to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter issued by the defendant to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued by MACT to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Office copy of letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of letter issued by the plaintiff to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 07/08/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases